Canadian Football and the American Game: History and Differences
Canadian and American football grew from the same rugby roots and then split. Here is how the two games diverged, how the Grey Cup and the CFL arose, and what the rules change in practice.
Turn on a Canadian Football League game for the first time and the first impression is that something is slightly off. The field looks too long. There seem to be too many players. The offense has only three chances to move the chains, and the quarterback has barely a breath between plays. A kicker who sends a ball into the end zone can earn a point even when nobody scores a touchdown.
None of this is an accident, and none of it means that one game is a poor copy of the other. Canadian and American football are cousins that grew from the same roots, separated at several points in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and developed into distinct sports with their own championships, traditions and styles of play.
This article tells the story of that divergence and explains, in plain terms, what the rule differences mean on the field. It is useful if you are new to the Canadian game, if you are curious about why NFL and CFL players sometimes cross the border, or if you simply want to understand why the same ball and the same goalposts can produce such different football.
Same roots, different branches
Both games descend from rugby and the old English football games that preceded it. In the middle of the nineteenth century, versions of these games were played at schools and colleges in both countries, and the rules varied from campus to campus. As the games organized, they tended to follow the model of rugby: an oval ball, running with the ball, tackling and kicking for points.
In Canada, the first documented football game is usually dated to 1861, played among students at the University of Toronto, although accounts of early matches vary and the rules were far from standard. British soldiers stationed in Canadian garrisons and the influence of rugby played at universities and clubs helped the game spread.
For the story of how the American branch separated from rugby and soccer, see The Origins of American Football. The short version is that American colleges, led by schools in the Northeast, gradually replaced rugby's scrum with a line of scrimmage and a system of downs.
The 1874 games that connected the two
A well-documented link between the two games came in 1874, when a team from McGill University in Montreal traveled to Harvard for two games. Because the schools played different rules, they agreed to play one game under Harvard's rules, a variation then known in the Boston area, and another under rugby-style rules favored by McGill. According to the usual account, Harvard's players liked the rugby version, and the visit helped nudge Harvard toward rugby-style football. A year later, Harvard and Yale played a game under rules that blended both, a milestone in the American story.
This is a nice reminder that the two games were not separate for long. They influenced each other early, and the divergence came later.
Where the paths split
After the 1870s, the American game changed rapidly. Walter Camp and other rule-makers introduced a line of scrimmage, eleven players a side, and later a system of downs, as described in Walter Camp and the Birth of the Modern Rules. Early American rules gave a team three downs to gain five yards; later the distance was extended to ten yards, and in 1912 a fourth down was added.
Canada adopted some of the same ideas, such as the snap from the center, but did so more slowly and in its own way. Canadian rule-makers adapted features of the scrimmage game in the early 1900s while keeping their own distinctive rules, including twelve players a side. Canada kept three downs, and the first-down distance remained ten yards. If that sounds familiar, it should: the three-down structure of the Canadian game resembles the way the American game worked in its earlier years, before the extra down was added.
The forward pass followed a different timetable too. In the United States, it was legalized in 1906, a story told in How the Forward Pass Became Legal. In Canada, the forward pass was not legal until 1929. The difference of more than two decades helped shape how each country's coaches and players thought about the game.
The Grey Cup
The great symbol of Canadian football is the Grey Cup. It was donated in 1909 by Earl Grey, who was then Governor General of Canada, as a trophy for the amateur rugby football championship of the country. The first Grey Cup game was played that year, and the University of Toronto's team defeated a club team from Parkdale in Toronto.
For several decades, the Grey Cup was contested by amateur and semi-professional teams. As the sport turned professional at its top level, the cup became the prize of the professional championship, and today it is awarded to the champion of the Canadian Football League. The game is played in late November and is a national event, with a week of festivities in the host city. Our article on leagues beyond the NFL describes other professional leagues and how they have fared.
The creation of the CFL
The Canadian Football League took its present name in 1958, when the organizations that had run professional football in the country's east and west came together under a single banner. The league has remained one of the smaller major professional sports leagues in North America, with fewer than a dozen teams and a strong regional identity. Several of its teams are community-based, and a few are owned by their communities rather than by individuals.
An experiment: the American expansion
In the 1990s, the CFL tried to grow by placing teams in American cities. For three seasons in the mid-1990s, teams played in cities in the United States, and one of them, the Baltimore Stallions, won the Grey Cup in 1995, the only American-based team ever to do so. The experiment ended after that season. The costs, the competition for fans and the logistics of the cross-border league proved too much, and the league returned to a Canada-only model.
The rules side by side
Here are the most visible differences between the two games. Rules are updated periodically in both countries and at different levels, so treat this as a general guide and consult the official rulebooks for details.
| Feature | Canadian football | American football (NFL) |
|---|---|---|
| Players per side | 12 | 11 |
| Downs to gain 10 yards | 3 | 4 |
| Field length (goal line to goal line) | 110 yards | 100 yards |
| End zone depth | 20 yards | 10 yards |
| Field width | 65 yards | About 53 yards |
| Play clock | 20 seconds | 40 seconds (25 after certain stoppages) |
| Single point for a kick into the end zone | Yes, called a rouge | No |
| Neutral zone | One yard between the teams | Length of the ball |
| Backfield motion | Several players may move before the snap | One player in motion at a time |
| Goalposts | On the goal line | At the back of the end zone |
| Punt returns | Kicking team must give the returner room | Fair catch option |
What the differences do to the game
Rules are not just trivia. They change strategy.
Three downs and a wide field
With only three downs, an offense cannot afford to run on first and second down and hope to convert on third. Teams tend to throw more often, and the quarterback must move the ball quickly. The wide field gives receivers more room, and the twelfth player adds another receiver or blocker to the formation. The result is a game that tends to be more pass-oriented and more spread out, although styles vary by team and by season.
The motion rule
In the Canadian game, more than one back can be in motion before the snap, and they can move toward the line of scrimmage. That makes it harder for the defense to read the formation. Defenders must cover receivers who are already running at full speed when the ball is snapped. The motion rule is one of the reasons some American players need an adjustment period when they first play the Canadian game.
The rouge and the kicking game
A kicker who sends the ball into the end zone, where the receiving team does not return it out, can score a single point, called a rouge. This means that punting and kicking carry scoring consequences in a way they usually do not in the American game. Because of the deep end zones, teams also think differently about field position.
The play clock
A twenty-second play clock leaves little time for the offense to get lined up and the quarterback to read the defense. The pace is quick, and the game demands fast communication and a relatively simple play-calling system.
The returner's room
On punts, the kicking team must stay a few yards away from the returner until the ball is caught, rather than allowing the American-style fair catch. This gives the returner a chance to catch the ball and run, and it changes how coverage teams are built.
Overtime
Overtime in the Canadian game uses a method similar to the college style, in which each team gets a possession starting near the opponent's end of the field. The details have been revised over the years, so check the current rulebook.
A hypothetical third down
Imagine a Canadian team facing third down with six yards to go near midfield. In the American game, that would be the point at which many coaches start thinking about a punt on the next play, because a fourth down remains as a safety net. In the Canadian game, third down is the last chance. The offense must either gain the yards, kick, or give the ball up where it stands. So a coach may call a pass to the sticks on second down to set up an easier third, and punting on second down is not unheard of when field position favors it.
The same pressure shapes the kicking game. A team that faces third and long often chooses to punt with the idea of pinning the opponent deep in its own territory, and the deep end zone means a kick that sails through it is worth a point if the receiving team does not bring it out. Neither choice is clearly right; the point is that the number of downs changes which questions a coach asks.
Players who cross the border
For decades, the Canadian game has served as an alternative path for players who want to play professionally. Some players who are not drafted or who are released by NFL teams sign with CFL teams and build careers there. A few have returned to the NFL. The best-known example is the quarterback Warren Moon, who went undrafted out of college, led the Edmonton team to five consecutive Grey Cup championships in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and then signed with an NFL team and played for many years. He was later inducted into both the Canadian and the American professional football halls of fame.
Canadian players also cross the border, and many play college football in the United States before returning home or continuing in the NFL. To protect opportunities for Canadian players, the CFL has rules about the number of Canadian players on a team's roster and in its starting lineup. The exact numbers are set in the league's agreements and change from time to time.
College and amateur football in Canada
Canadian universities play football under Canadian rules, with twelve players and three downs. The national university championship is the Vanier Cup, which has been awarded since the 1960s. The country's university athletic body, now called U Sports, organizes the league, and many CFL players come through the university system. Canadian high schools and amateur leagues play as well; rules and age groupings vary by province, so check the local association for what applies.
Canadian Thanksgiving
Canada's Thanksgiving falls on the second Monday in October, and the CFL traditionally schedules games on that holiday weekend. It is a parallel to the American tradition we describe in Thanksgiving Football, and it is a reminder that harvest-time holidays have long been a natural date for football in both countries.
How to learn the Canadian game
If you are curious about trying it, a few suggestions follow. Watch a game and focus on one rule difference at a time, starting with the three downs and the motion before the snap. Read the league's official rulebook for any rule you do not understand. And if you are a recreational player, you can find information on flag and touch versions of the sport in our Play section. For results and schedules in the American game, our scores page and schedule page are good starting points, and the college section covers American college teams.
Common misconceptions
"The Canadian game is just American football with different numbers." The differences in motion, kicking and the play clock change strategy in significant ways.
"The CFL is a minor league." It is a professional league with its own championship and traditions, and it is not a developmental league for the NFL.
"Canadian football is older because Canada is older." Both games share a common ancestry and influenced each other, and neither is a direct descendant of the other.
"Americans cannot play in the CFL." American players have a long history in the CFL, subject to the league's roster rules on Canadian players.
The short version
- Both games descend from rugby, and early contact between McGill and Harvard helped link them.
- Canada kept twelve players and three downs, legalized the forward pass in 1929, and developed its own championship, the Grey Cup, first awarded in 1909.
- The Canadian Football League took its present name in 1958 and briefly expanded into the United States in the 1990s.
- The Canadian field is longer and wider, with deeper end zones, and the play clock is shorter.
- Motion before the snap, the rouge and the returner's room change strategy.
- Players cross the border in both directions, and the CFL has rules about Canadian players on rosters.
- Rules change over time, so consult the official rulebooks for current details.